Gang v You (No 3)

[2021] ACTSC 318

Supreme Court of the ACT15 December 2021

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Civil Law
2. › CONTRACT
3. › where the plaintiff claims there was an agreement to merge the plaintiff’s company with the first defendant’s company
4. › breach of contract
5. › where the plaintiff claims the first defendant breached the alleged merger agreement
6. › sale of property
7. › where the plaintiff sold his property to the first defendant
8. › whether the proceeds of sale should have been paid to the plaintiff or the first defendant’s company
1. Equity
2. › EQUITABLE AND FIDUCIARY DUTIES
3. › where the plaintiff claims the second defendant acted as his solicitor in the sale of property
4. › where the plaintiff claims the first and second defendants owed the plaintiff equitable and fiduciary duties
5. › whether those equitable and fiduciary duties were breached
1. Solicitor
2. › CONFLICT OF DUTIES
3. › where the plaintiff claims the second defendant failed to disclose its conflict of duties
4. › whether the second defendant breached r 11 of the Legal Profession (Solicitors) Conduct Rules 2015 (ACT)

Citation[2021] ACTSC 318

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date15 December 2021

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in