Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

SBT v Wright [2021] ACTSC 322 — Appeal & Admission Of Further Evidence — Barrister AI

SBT v Wright

[2021] ACTSC 322

Supreme Court of the ACT21 December 2021

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › APPEAL
3. › Appeal from ACT Magistrates Court
4. › sentence appeal
5. › whether sentences imposed were manifestly excessive
6. › common assault
7. › property damage
8. › fail to appear
9. › resist arrest
10. › fail to stop
11. › drive unlicensed as a repeated offender
12. › drive motor vehicle without consent
13. › six offences committed while appellant was a young person
14. › where appellant has mental health diagnoses
15. › sentences not manifestly excessive
16. › appeal dismissed
1. Appeal
2. › ADMISSION OF FURTHER EVIDENCE
3. › Where appellant sought to admit further evidence on appeal
4. › whether admission of further evidence means that it is no longer necessary to establish an error prior to resentencing
5. › operation of s 214 of the Magistrates Court Act 1930 (ACT)
6. › error is necessary for an appeal even if further evidence is admitted
7. › further evidence not admitted

Case Details

Citation[2021] ACTSC 322

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date21 December 2021

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 11 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by11

2024Donnelly v LesterACTSC 393
2024Agarwal v Coutts (No 2)ACTSC 92
2024R v Po'oi (No 6); DPP v Po'oiACTSC 6
2023Fihelly v BluettACTSC 393
and 7 more after sign-in

Relies on23

2021R v Blackburn; R v QHACTSC 284
2021R v Goolagong (No 2)ACTSC 131
2021R v Dowling (No 2)ACTSC 200
2021R v Po'oiACTSC 151
and 19 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works