A television report that juxtaposes graphic footage of animal cruelty with a regulator's confident but ultimately incorrect assurances about the efficacy of industry rules conveys that the regulator was ineffective and overconfident, but does not convey that the regulator knowingly permitted the cruelty or was dishonest in his denials, where the report makes clear the regulator had not seen the evidence and the allegation of dishonesty was never put to him.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 13 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 13 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.