A VET provider's marketing and enrolment systems were each separately unconscionable under s 21 of the ACL where they were designed to maximise VET FEE-HELP revenue by deploying uncontrolled brokers and agents to target vulnerable consumers with inducements and misrepresentations, while displaying callous indifference to consumers' eligibility, suitability, and capacity to complete the courses in which they were enrolled.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.