Where the Tribunal's reasons demonstrate engagement with harm claims and the evidentiary material overlaps between human consequences and non-refoulement claims, the Omar obligation may be satisfied even where the analysis appears under non-refoulement headings in challenges to Tribunal decisions under s 501CA(4).
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 14 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 14 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.