The applicant bears the onus of demonstrating current fitness in reinstatement applications, the review tribunal cannot revisit the original deregistration findings under s 163C(2), and evidence of professional competence is irrelevant where deregistration was based on impairment alone.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 22 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 22 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.