The Court has emphasised strongly that suppression of a legal practitioner's name in disciplinary proceedings is inconsistent with the public interest in open justice, and that a conviction for perverting the course of justice will ordinarily result in a finding of probable permanent unfitness to practise.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.