Findings of professional misconduct or incompetence to practise under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law are evaluative judgments, not discretionary decisions, and therefore cannot be challenged on appeal as of right by asserting House v The King error; only the protective orders are amenable to such challenge.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 13 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 13 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.