A trial judge's preference for one body of medical evidence over another, and factual findings based on lay evidence of symptoms combined with surgical findings, do not constitute errors in point of law amenable to appeal under s 142N of the District Court Act 1973 (NSW).
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.