A sentencing judge's failure to expressly label a finding as relating to 'moral culpability' does not constitute error where the substance of such a finding is apparent from the sentencing remarks. There is no presumption that an offender's mental impairment or disability makes them an inappropriate vehicle for general deterrence; the assessment of the impact of mental health on sentence is a discretionary matter for the sentencing judge. Delay in finalisation of proceedings caused by an offender's late guilty plea and adjournment requests by the offender's lawyers will generally not attract a sentencing discount for delay.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 16 later cases that cite this judgment.
6 of the 16 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.