Where a sentencing judge expresses an intention to partially accumulate a sentence with existing terms of imprisonment but the sentence as imposed effects complete accumulation, this constitutes sentencing error requiring re-sentencing. Not all calculation errors in pre-sentence custody require re-sentencing, but where error on accumulation is established, re-sentencing is necessary in any event.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.