711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Tadros [2021] NSWSC 1463 — Cross-claims & Relief Against Forfeiture — Barrister AI
← Back
711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Tadros
[2021] NSWSC 1463
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Civil Procedure
›
Cross-claims
›
against plaintiff
›
application to amend Commercial List Cross-Claim List Statement to add claim for relief against forfeiture
›
where clause in lease obliged lessees to pay rent without any deduction or set-off whatsoever
›
where lessees allege unconscionability on the part of the lessor
›
whether leave should be refused on basis claim bound to fail
Equity
›
relief against forfeiture
›
where clause in lease obliged lessees to pay rent without any deduction or set-off whatsoever
›
whether such a clause effective without more to deny relief against forfeiture
Case Details
Citation
[2021] NSWSC 1463
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2021] NSWSC 1463
9 authorities it relies on
1964
1975
1986
1997
2008
2021
Relies on
9
2020
Sneakerboy Retail Pty Ltd trading as Sneakerboy v Georges Properties Pty Ltd
NSWSC 996
2018
711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Anthony Tadros
NSWSC 628
2016
711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Tadros; Tadros v 711 Hogben Pty Ltd
NSWSC 1683
2016
711 Hogben Pty Ltd v Tadros; Tadros v 711 Hogben Pty Ltd
NSWSC 697
and 5 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works