› where plaintiff undertook works on land on expectation that 99-year lease had been granted
› where defendant took back possession of land
› where statute prevents enforcement of plaintiff’s expectation of leasehold interest in land
› where plaintiff seeks value of improvements made to land which have increased over period of plaintiff’s continuing trespass on subject land
› whether equitable compensation available
› quantification of relief
Estoppel
› Anshun estoppel
› where consent orders in earlier proceeding dismissed plaintiff claims for declarations and specific performance regarding agreement for lease
› where further orders in earlier proceeding dismissed plaintiff’s cross-claim for monetary relief on terms that did not prevent plaintiff claiming same relief in fresh proceedings
› whether unreasonable for plaintiff not to bring present claims in earlier proceeding
Land Law
› Indigenous land rights
› Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 (NSW)
› Dealings by Aboriginal Land Councils
› where agreement for lease entered into in 1992 between plaintiff and Local Aboriginal Land Council void as not approved by New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council
› whether void agreement for lease is subject to new land dealing provisions introduced in 2010
› whether plaintiff denied relief for equitable compensation or restitution by operation of s 42E(5)
Case Details
Citation[2021] NSWSC 1699
CourtNSWSC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.