› whether litigant has frequently instituted and conducted vexatious proceedings in Australia
› established
› whether confined orders pressed should be made - evidence and litigant’s conduct of the proceedings establishes that she will continue to pursue the beliefs which resulted in her pursuit of vexatious proceedings if orders sought not made
› orders made.
Civil Procedure
› Parties
› Vexatious litigants
› Stay of proceedings
› orders required to shield litigants and to protect Courts
› stay granted in respect of specified District Court proceedings.
Case Details
Citation[2021] NSWSC 63
CourtNSWSC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 11 later cases that cite this judgment.