› Indictment charging five accused as being party to one, or both, of two separate conspiracies, in different locations, between different people and relating to different countries, with no overlap in time
› Counts 1 and 2 are to be tried separately
Evidence
› Alleged cross-admissibility of evidence relating to one conspiracy to proof of the other
› Relevance other than to the state of mind of alleged common conspirator not established
› Ruling made
Case Details
Citation[2021] NSWSC 682
CourtNSWSC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.