The Queen v ML (No 2) [2021] NTSC 67 — Practice And Procedure & Evidence — Barrister AI
← Back
The Queen v ML (No 2)
[2021] NTSC 67
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+3 more
Criminal Law
›
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
›
application to sever counts on the indictment
›
Criminal Code s 341A
›
presumption in favour of joint trials of sexual offences
›
evidence on all counts cross-admissible
›
application refused
Evidence
›
Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act ss 97, 97A and 101(2)
›
whether evidence of charged acts and uncharged acts admissible as tendency evidence
›
some charged acts are child sexual offences, others not
›
held
›
evidence of all charged and uncharged acts has significant probative value in relation to all charges
›
probative value outweighs any danger of unfair prejudice to the accused
›
evidence admitted as tendency evidence
Evidence
›
evidence of charged and uncharged acts admitted as context or relationship evidence
›
relevant to credit of complainant
›
relevant to credit of accused
Criminal Code 1983 (NT) s 341A
Case Details
Citation
[2021] NTSC 67
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2021] NTSC 67
10 authorities it relies on
1999
2003
2007
2011
2015
2021
Relies on
10
2020
Nguyen v The Queen
HCA 23
2018
McPhillamy v The Queen
HCA 52
2018
The Queen v AW
NTSC 29
2017
Hughes v The Queen
HCA 20
and 6 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works