Circumstantial evidence linking an accused to mobile phone numbers — including subscriber records, possession of the phone, travel records matching claimed absences, transition between numbers with similar terminology and pricing, and connections to vehicles registered to family members — can be sufficient to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the user of those numbers. Evidence of at least two actual supplies, offers to supply, restocking, use of agents, advertising on chat groups, and market-consistent pricing is sufficient to establish carrying on the business of trafficking, even where contact is sporadic and there is no direct evidence of commercial markup or unsourced income.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.