For a youthful first offender (early 20s) with no criminal history and excellent prospects of rehabilitation, a sentencing judge errs by treating a non-custodial sentence as outside the proper range and by identifying general deterrence as the paramount sentencing consideration. Rehabilitation remains the dominant consideration for such offenders even where the offending is serious and premeditated, and general deterrence can be sufficiently reflected in the head sentence without requiring actual custody.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.