A trial judge who refuses leave to amend pleadings on the basis of prejudice to the opposing party commits an error of principle if the judge fails to consider whether that prejudice could be adequately met by an adjournment with costs. Where a trial is in fact adjourned after the refusal, the discretionary calculus on appeal is substantially affected because the opposing party can no longer complain of being required to meet new issues without preparation time.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.