Queensland Building & Construction Commission v van Uden (No. 2) [2021] QDC 162 — Power Of Court To Punish For Contempt & Costs — Barrister AI
← Back
Queensland Building & Construction Commission v van Uden (No. 2)
[2021] QDC 162
District Court of Queensland
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Contempt of Court
›
POWER OF COURT TO PUNISH FOR CONTEMPT
›
PENALTY
›
where continued non-compliance with court orders
›
where contemnor has failed to engage in proceedings
›
where acts were wilful and contumacious
›
where proceedings should have coercive and punitive purpose
›
where no remorse expressed
›
where refusal to purge contempt
›
where there is a need for both deterrence and denunciation
Procedure
›
COSTS
›
COSTS ON INDEMNITY BASIS
›
where the applicant/plaintiff seeks costs on the indemnity basis
›
where the respondent/defendant continuously disobeyed court orders
›
where the respondent/defendant has been convicted of contempt
Case Details
Citation
[2021] QDC 162
Court
QDC
Jurisdiction
Queensland
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2021] QDC 162
9 authorities it relies on
1999
2003
2007
2011
2015
2021
Relies on
9
2021
Queensland Building & Construction Commission v van Uden
QDC 103
2019
Hera Project Pty Ltd v Bisognin & Anor (No 2)
VSC 625
2019
Hera Project Pty Ltd v Bisognin
VSC 483
2014
Vaysman v Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc
FCAFC 60
and 5 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
