Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Burger v Hickling [2021] QDC 41 — Procedure — Barrister AI

Burger v Hickling

[2021] QDC 41

District Court of Queensland

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Procedure
2. › CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTS
3. › ADMISSIONS ‑
4. › WITHDRAWAL
5. › Where interlocutory applications are brought by each party within defamation proceedings
6. › Where the plaintiff claims that there are no deemed admissions
7. › Where the defendant submits that there are deemed admissions because the reply did not respond to relevant paragraphs of the defence
8. › Whether the plaintiff should be given leave to withdraw any deemed admissions
1. Procedure
2. › CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTS
3. › PLEADINGS
4. › STRIKING OUT
5. › GENERALLY
6. › Where particular pleadings do not comply with r 166(3) of the UCPR and therefore fall within the vice of sub-rule 171(1)(b) of the UCPR
1. Procedure
2. › CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTS
3. › TRIAL
4. › TIME AND PLACE
5. › Whether the defendant’s signature on the request for trial date should be dispensed with and the matter set down for trial
6. › Where parties have obligations not to sign a request for trial date until they are truly ready

Case Details

Citation[2021] QDC 41

CourtQDC

JurisdictionQueensland

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on10

2020Taylor David Pty Ltd v WalkerQDC 334
2016Smith v LuchtQCA 267
2013Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Managed Investments Limited & Ors No.4QSC 15
2012Hartmann v Pilkington & OrsQSC 254
and 6 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works