Rodriquez v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia [2021] SAET 242 — “employed” And If So By Whom — Barrister AI
← Back
Rodriquez v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia
[2021] SAET 242
South Australian Employment Tribunal
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+13 more
“employed” and if so by whom
›
Whether the applicant’s
injuries arose from or in the
course of employment and if so, whether that
employment was a significant contributing cause of her injuries
Case Details
Citation
[2021] SAET 242
Court
SAET
Jurisdiction
South Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2021] SAET 242
3 authorities it relies on
1937
1954
1971
1988
2005
2021
Relies on
3
1996
Darrin Zickar v MGH Plastic Industries Pty Ltd
HCA 31
1960
Kavanagh v Commonwealth
HCA 25
1937
Henderson v Commissioner of Railways (WA)
HCA 67
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
