A contention that a court failed to take into account a fact will not generally amount to a 'misapprehension of fact' sufficient to enliven the jurisdiction to set aside a judgment; it is a complaint to be made on appeal. Disagreement with an evaluative judgment about the weight of evidence is not a misapprehension of fact. Defective pleading of a defence of justification does not, without more, establish that the defence was improper or unjustifiable for the purposes of aggravated damages.
The full text is available to signed-in members.