Where a co-offender has been sentenced to a lesser term on a more serious related charge, it is not reasonably open to impose a greater sentence on the less serious charge, and the resulting reduction must be reflected in the total effective sentence and non-parole period. The Crown cannot resist a reduction in the total effective sentence on the basis that the sentence on the principal charge was lenient, where it did not appeal that sentence. The Court expressed doubt about whether, once leave to appeal has been granted and error established, an appeal may be dismissed on the basis that the total effective sentence should not be reduced.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 12 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 12 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.