Suicidal ideation does not constitute a discrete sentencing category warranting special mitigatory treatment. Where suicidal ideation is the product of voluntary alcohol consumption and the offender knew from past experience the effects of such consumption, the suicidal ideation cannot provide mitigation. The reasoning in Tedford v The Queen [2020] VSCA 71 — that those who selfishly disregard risks to others to satisfy suicidal ends can expect substantial punishment — applies equally to those who deliberately expose themselves to a risk of death while ruminating about suicide.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.