When resentencing following the quashing of some convictions, the court is not required to maintain mathematical equivalence between the new total effective sentence and non-parole period and the ratio that existed in the original sentence. The non-parole period must be fixed as appropriate in all the circumstances. Deterioration in mental health since original sentencing is a relevant consideration on resentencing but does not necessarily require a reduction in sentence.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.