Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd [No 2]

(2021) 57 WAR 468; [2021] WASCA 105

Western Australia Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Abuse of process
3. › Permanent stay of proceedings
4. › Withdrawal of claims from earlier proceedings to obtain expedited trial
5. › Whether subsequent proceedings pursuing withdrawn claims constituted abuse of process
6. › Whether claims abandoned or merely excised
7. › Relevance of inter partes undertakings and assurances
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Abuse of process
3. › Standard of appellate review
4. › Whether decision to stay proceedings was discretionary or evaluative
5. › Application of House v The King principles
1. Corporations
2. › Shareholder's claim for reflective loss
3. › Whether shareholder may claim for diminution in value of shares reflecting company's loss
4. › Whether company's inability to pursue claims due to abuse of process alters reflective loss principle
5. › Whether independent cause of action under guarantee or indemnity takes claim outside reflective loss principle
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Abuse of process
3. › Claim by shareholder as alter ego of company
4. › Whether permitting shareholder's claim would circumvent court's stay of company's proceedings

Quick Take

A plaintiff who deliberately withdraws claims from proceedings to obtain an expedited trial on confined issues, and whose conduct conveys to the court and the opposing party that the withdrawn claims are abandoned, will be precluded from relitigating those claims in fresh proceedings as an abuse of process. The reflective loss principle bars a shareholder's claim for diminution in share value reflecting the company's loss even where the company is precluded from suing by abuse of process (not merely where the company has no cause of action), and even where the shareholder has an independent cause of action under a guarantee or indemnity. A shareholder's claim that has the objective effect of circumventing a court's stay of the company's proceedings may itself constitute an abuse of process.