Ryan v Bunnings Group Limited; Ryan v Eastlake Football Club Limited; Ryan v Bhagria; Ryan v O'Halloran; Ryan v Cain (No 3)

[2022] ACTCA 24

ACT Court of Appeal12 May 2022

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › Application in proceeding
3. › Application for leave to issue subpoenas
4. › Where application to adduce further evidence not yet heard
5. › Where grant of leave may prevent hearing being completed in allocated time
6. › Where non-compliance with procedural rules
7. › Court Procedures Rules 2006 (ACT), rr 5606, 6603

Quick Take

An application for leave to issue subpoenas filed six days before an appeal hearing will be refused where the underlying application to adduce further evidence has slender prospects, the late filing risks the hearing not being completed in allocated time, and there is non-compliance with rules for short service of subpoenas.

Case Details

Citation[2022] ACTCA 24

CourtACTCA

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date12 May 2022

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on1

2020Ryan v Bunnings Group Limited; Ryan v Eastlake Football Club Limited; Ryan v O’Halloran & Ors; Ryan v Bhagria & AnorACTSC 353

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in