Where a sentencing judge assesses the objective seriousness of child sexual offending as just below the worst category, a starting point of 16 years out of a maximum of 25 years is manifestly inadequate. The disconnect between findings of extreme seriousness and the sentence imposed constitutes latent error warranting appellate intervention, even where no specific error in the sentencing judge's reasoning can be identified.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.