› Accused facing trial for sexual intercourse without consent
› Significant pre-trial publicity and commentary including speech by witness on live television endorsing the complainant’s credibility and claimed status as a victim
› Whether possible to empanel an impartial jury
› Whether prejudice able to be addressed by directions by the trial judge
Case Details
Citation[2022] ACTSC 145
CourtACTSC
JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory
Decision Date21 June 2022
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
