Visa cancellation decisions challenged on grounds of inconsistent Tribunal findings require demonstration that the inconsistency is stark or extreme, not merely that different conclusions were reached in different contexts; findings addressing different propositions (e.g., likelihood of relapse generally versus likelihood of imprisonment specifically) may not be inconsistent.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.