While the Tribunal must engage with representations about the prospect of indefinite detention for visa holders facing mandatory cancellation under s 501(3A), it is not required to make specific findings about the likelihood of such detention or to speculate about the outcome of future visa applications.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 18 later cases that cite this judgment.
6 of the 18 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.