Nitopi v Nitopi

• 1. Equity
  2. › Unconscionable conduct
  3. › Special disability or disadvantage
  4. › Knowledge requirement
  5. › Whether constructive notice sufficient
  6. › Whether constructive knowledge sufficient
  7. › Distinction between constructive notice and constructive knowledge
• 1. Equity
  2. › Unconscionable conduct
  3. › Gifts
  4. › Equitable presumption of unconscientious exploitation
  5. › Whether presumption arises once special disadvantage, knowledge and improvidence established
  6. › Nature of presumption as evidentiary aid
• 1. Equity
  2. › Unconscionable conduct
  3. › Exploitation requirement
  4. › Whether predatory state of mind required
  5. › Whether passive acceptance or retention of benefit sufficient
  6. › Unconscientious retention of gifts
• 1. Equity
  2. › Unconscionable conduct
  3. › Moral pressure
  4. › Whether implicit request for money by adult child to parent constitutes moral pressure sufficient for unconscionable dealing
  5. › Procedural fairness in raising moral pressure allegation

Quick Take