› Application to set aside vexatious proceedings order
› Fifth application on substantially similar grounds
› Whether abuse of process
› Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), ss 8, 9(4)
Constitutional Law (Cth)
› Inconsistency of laws
› Section 109 of the Constitution
› Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 78B
› Whether mere assertion of constitutional invalidity requires s 78B notices
› Whether frivolous or unarguable contention
Administrative Law
› Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
› Federal proceedings
› Section 34B
› Whether Tribunal disciplinary decision stayed by subsequent Federal Court proceedings between applicant and insurer
Quick Take
This case is of minimal precedential value, being a fact-specific dismissal of a vexatious litigant's fifth application to set aside a vexatious proceedings order on substantially similar grounds.