Ranclose Investments Pty Ltd v Leda Management Services Pty Ltd

• 1. Costs
  2. › Security for costs
  3. › Power to order dismissal for non-compliance
  4. › Whether power of dismissal under UCPR r 42.21(3) available against defendant not having security order in its favour
  5. › Whether proceedings may be dismissed against all defendants where only one obtained security order
  6. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.21(1), (3)
• 1. Costs
  2. › Security for costs
  3. › Constitutional validity
  4. › Whether UCPR r 42.21(3) invalid for inconsistency with s 1335 of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
  5. › Whether absence of express dismissal power in s 1335 creates negative stipulation
  6. › Constitution (Cth), s 109
  7. › Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1335
  8. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.21(3)
• 1. Appeal
  2. › Leave to appeal
  3. › Extension of time
  4. › Where delay attributable to solicitors' inadvertence rather than applicants
  5. › Discretionary factors
  6. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.10(2)
• 1. Appeal
  2. › Leave to appeal
  3. › Interlocutory orders
  4. › Threshold for grant of leave
  5. › Whether issue of principle, question of public importance, or reasonably clear injustice
  6. › District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127(2)(a)

Quick Take