› Whether applicant denied procedural fairness in hearing of leave application
› Whether court obliged to address all grounds raised by applicant
Practice and Procedure
› Vexatious proceedings
› Repeated applications to reopen judgments
› Whether order restricting future applications should be made
› Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW)
Quick Take
This case illustrates that dissatisfaction with reasoning and result does not constitute a basis for reopening a judgment under UCPR Pt 36 rr 36.15-36.17; such complaints must be pursued on appeal.