R v Lupton (No 3) [2022] NSWSC 36 — Application To Revive Memory & Considerations — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Lupton (No 3)
[2022] NSWSC 36
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+4 more
Evidence
›
application to revive memory
›
relevant
considerations
›
witness not certain of memory at time of statement
uncertainty patent on terms of the statement
›
“doing things
I shouldn’t have been doing”
Case Details
Citation
[2022] NSWSC 36
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2022] NSWSC 36
2 authorities it relies on
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Relies on
2
2018
R v Jenkin (No 5)
NSWSC 730
2016
R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 24)
NSWSC 105
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
