Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Culjak v Akrawe [2022] NSWSC 949 — Deposit — Barrister AI

Culjak v Akrawe

[2022] NSWSC 949

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Contracts
2. › deposit
3. › contract for the sale of land
4. › where vendors claim to have forfeited purchaser’s deposit by reason of purchaser’s breach of contract
5. › where purchaser seeks order for return of deposit pursuant to Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 55(2A)
6. › held not unjust or inequitable to allow vendors to forfeit the deposit in accordance with the terms of the contract

Case Details

Citation[2022] NSWSC 949

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by3

2024Fu v Bondi Junction Prime Pty LtdFedCFamC2G 513
2023Akrawe v CuljakNSWCA 171
2022D Capital 2 Pty Ltd v WesternNSWSC 1064

Relies on6

2006Luong Dinh Luu v Sovereign Developments Pty Ltd & 2 OrsNSWCA 40
2005Havyn Pty Ltd v WebsterNSWCA 182
2003Romanos v Pentagold Investments Pty LtdHCA 58
2003Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v CauchiHCA 57
and 2 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works