› Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) s 97 and s 101
› Tendency evidence
› Whether tendency evidence has significant probative value
› whether probative value of the evidence outweighs the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant
Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) s 97, s 101
[name withheld] v The Queen; [name withheld] v The Queen; OAE v The Queen [2008] HCA 16; (2008) 235 CLR 334; Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20; IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; McPhillamy v The Queen [2018] HCA 52; (2018) 361 ALR 13; R v Bauer [2018] HCA 40; (2018) 92 ALJR 846; R v Lisoff [1999] NSWCCA 364; The Queen v AW [2018] NTSC 29; R v Grant [2016] NTSC 54 applied
TL v The Queen [2020] NSWCCA 265; Aravena v R (2015) 91 NSWLR 258; [2015] NSWCCA 288; Reeves v The Queen (2013) A Crim R 448; [2013] VSCA 311; The Queen v Wicks [2018] NTSC 4 referred to
Case Details
Citation[2022] NTSC 59
CourtNTSC
JurisdictionNorthern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.
