In a circumstantial murder case where the defence points to an alternative suspect, the prosecution must exclude beyond reasonable doubt the hypothesis that the alternative suspect committed the offence. However, significant differences in the quality of evidence connecting each suspect — including the nature and evolution of lies told by the accused, DNA evidence, and the timing of the accused's first mention of the alternative suspect — may make it reasonably open to the jury to exclude the alternative hypothesis.
The full text is available to signed-in members.