Hancock Farming Enterprises v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia & Gleeson [2022] SAET 171 — Permission Or Authority & Worker — Barrister AI
← Back
Hancock Farming Enterprises v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia & Gleeson
[2022] SAET 171
South Australian Employment Tribunal
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+14 more
worker’s employer could validly lodge a claim on his behalf without his
permission or authority
›
Whether
worker - Held : The employer did not validly lodge a claim on the
worker’s behalf, but the worker later adopted the claim when given the
Case Details
Citation
[2022] SAET 171
Court
SAET
Jurisdiction
South Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
