Jones v Bonde (No 2)

[2022] TASSC 35

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Magistrates
2. › Appeal and review
3. › Tasmania
4. › Motion to review
5. › When remedy available
6. › Inadequacy of reasons for decision
7. › Aggravated assault
8. › Charge found proved
9. › Explanation why evidence of complainant accepted in preference to evidence of accused.
1. Phillips v Arnold [2009] TASSC 43, 19 Tas R 21; Robinson v Chatters [2010] TASSC 66; Jotheeswaran v Barnes [2019] TASSC 42, applied.
1. Aust Dig Magistrates [1345]
1. Magistrates
2. › Appeal and review
3. › Tasmania
4. › Motion to review
5. › When remedy available
6. › Inadequacy of reasons for decision
7. › Aggravated assault
8. › Charge found proved
9. › Finding of guilt reasonably open to magistrate.

Citation[2022] TASSC 35

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in