The 'bare possibility' threshold for standing to lodge a caveat against a grant of probate, as stated in Gardiner v Hughes, connotes something more than mere speculation as to the existence of an interest. A potential family provision claim under Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) does not confer standing to lodge and maintain a caveat against a grant of probate, because such a claim can be brought regardless of the validity of any will and intestacy is not a prerequisite. A person cannot represent the interests of another in probate proceedings while an administration order appointing a different administrator remains on foot, absent appointment as litigation guardian or representative under the Rules of Court.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.