Billis v McLERNON [No 3] [2022] WASC 38 — Per Se, Irritating As That May — Barrister AI
← Back
Billis v McLERNON [No 3]
[2022] WASC 38
Supreme Court of Western Australia
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+3 more
namely, to a lack of corporate dividends paid to shareholders of a corporation.
But the non‑payment of a corporate dividend
per se, irritating as that may
be to a shareholder, does not rise to a level of suggesting any necessarily
Case Details
Citation
[2022] WASC 38
Court
WASC
Jurisdiction
Western Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2022] WASC 38
13 authorities it relies on
1974
1984
1994
2004
2014
2022
Relies on
13
2021
Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Voller; Nationwide News Pty Limited v Voller; Australian News Channel Pty Ltd v Voller
HCA 27
2021
Ferguson v Dallow (No 4)
FCA 513
2016
Douglas v McLERNON [No 4]
WASC 320
2015
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Ltd
HCA 21
and 9 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
