Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Roy [2023] ACTSC 174 — Application — Barrister AI

R v Roy

[2023] ACTSC 174

Supreme Court of the ACT11 July 2023

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › APPLICATION
3. › application by accused for
1. conditional temporary stay of criminal proceedings
2. › where legal costs
1. incurred unnecessarily as a result of delays in preparation of prosecution brief
1. usual vicissitudes of defending criminal proceedings

Case Details

Citation[2023] ACTSC 174

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date11 July 2023

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2024DPP v O'Brien (a pseudonym) (No 2)ACTSC 276

Relies on7

2023DPP v B Makoi; K Makoi; N Matot; A Matot; A DauACTSC 22
2018R v NozhatACTSC 317
2016Macdonald v R; Maitland v RNSWCCA 306
2011R v BuiACTSC 102
and 3 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works