DPP v Austin (No 3)

[2023] ACTSC 204

Supreme Court of the ACT21 July 2023

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › EVIDENCE
3. › Sexual offence proceedings
1. credibility evidence
2. › where prosecution sought to adduce evidence
1. of prior consistent representations of the complainant - whether s 108 of the
1. Evidence Act 2011 (ACT) enlivened
2. › whether discretion should be

Citation[2023] ACTSC 204

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date21 July 2023

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in