DPP v Hagen (No 2)

[2023] ACTSC 386

Supreme Court of the ACT12 December 2023

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
1. Judgment and Punishment
2. › breach of Good Behaviour Order
3. › offender
1. has engaged in significant rehabilitation since breach
2. › breach offence was
1. relatively minor
2. › where offender has served

Citation[2023] ACTSC 386

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date12 December 2023

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in