Xiao v ACT Commercial Builders Pty Ltd [2023] ACTSC 44 — Construction & Objective Theory Of Contract — Barrister AI
← Back
Xiao v ACT Commercial Builders Pty Ltd
[2023] ACTSC 44
Supreme Court of the ACT
14 March 2023
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+2 more
Contracts
›
Construction
›
Identification of parties
Objective theory of contract
Appeals
›
where parties provided statement of agreed facts to
Magistrate including agreement that a contract was signed by a director
Case Details
Citation
[2023] ACTSC 44
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
14 March 2023
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2023] ACTSC 44
6 authorities it relies on
2007
2010
2013
2016
2019
2023
Relies on
6
2020
Australian Securities & Investments Commission v AMP Financial Planning Pty Ltd (No 2)
FCA 69
2018
Limelight Cinemas Pty Ltd v Beatty
ACTSC 18
2015
Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate
HCA 46
2011
Padstow Corporation Pty Ltd v Fleming (No 2)
NSWSC 1572
and 2 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
