DPP v Whittle [2023] ACTSC 64 — Reference Appeal & Interpretation — Barrister AI
← Back
DPP v Whittle
[2023] ACTSC 64
Supreme Court of the ACT
30 March 2023
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Criminal Law
›
REFERENCE APPEAL
›
Statutory
interpretation
›
whether offence of possession or use of prohibited
firearms under
s 42(1)(a)(ii) of the Firearms Act 1996 (ACT) is an
Case Details
Citation
[2023] ACTSC 64
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
30 March 2023
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2023] ACTSC 64
9 authorities it relies on
1957
1970
1983
1996
2009
2023
Relies on
9
2020
Minister for Home Affairs v DMA18 as litigation guardian for DLZ18; Minister for Home Affairs v Marie Theresa Arthur as litigation representative for BXD18, Minister for Home Affairs v FRX17 as litigation representative for FRM17; Minister for Home Affairs v DJA18 as litigation representative for DIZ18
HCA 43
2018
The Director of Public Prosecutions v Booth
ACTCA 8
2004
Singh v Commonwealth
HCA 43
1995
PMT Partners Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Australian National Parks & Wildlife Service
HCA 36
and 5 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
