GJA Kalra Pty Ltd v Amgade Pty Ltd

[2023] NSWCA 119

NSW Court of Appeal

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Estoppel
2. › Promissory estoppel
3. › Detrimental reliance
4. › Whether representee acted to its detriment in reliance upon representation
5. › Whether representation made after contract could have been relied upon
6. › Whether allowance of rebate by landlord constituted detrimental reliance
1. Estoppel
2. › Promissory estoppel
3. › Estoppel running with the land
4. › Whether estoppel can in appropriate circumstances run with the land
5. › Whether promise concerning land automatically attaches to the land

Quick Take

Promissory estoppel in land transactions requires detrimental reliance at the time of the relevant act, and a representation made after a binding contract was entered into cannot found reliance where the contract preceded the representation.

Case Details

Citation[2023] NSWCA 119

CourtNSWCA

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2024Lh v RNSWCCA 165

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in